Three Eras of VDNKh: Why the Pavilions Changed Their Names and Appearance

The history of the VDNKh pavilions is revealed through their changing names, exhibitions and façades. The state repeatedly revised what was to be displayed and the order in which visitors were meant to encounter the country’s achievements. In 1939, the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition showcased agriculture, the Soviet republics and the regions; for its reopening in 1954, architects created a monumental image of the post-war Soviet Union; and in the 1960s, the buildings came to showcase science, industry and space exploration above all.

These three periods provide useful analytical snapshots, but they do not encompass the entire chronology. Between them came the wartime closure, post-war design work, the creation of separate industrial exhibitions, the consolidation of the exhibition sites into VDNKh of the USSR, sectoral reforms and subsequent reconstructions. A pavilion’s name, exhibition and architecture often changed at different times, while a new programme might conceal an earlier façade or be housed within an older building. The present-day ensemble should therefore be read as a multilayered historical document.

How the three historical snapshots relate to the actual reconstructions

The periodisation based on 1939, 1954 and the 1960s describes three approaches to organising the exhibition space. Each pavilion had its own chronology: some buildings retained their load-bearing structures and acquired extensions, while others were demolished and rebuilt on the same site. Their façades, names and contents could also change at different times. The three snapshots therefore do not represent three simultaneous reconstructions of the entire ensemble.

The chronology reveals this fragmented development. Following the 1939 and 1940 seasons, the exhibition opened only briefly in 1941; its exhibits were then evacuated, and some of the premises were used for military purposes. The decision to revive the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition was taken in 1948, major reconstruction began in the early 1950s, and the exhibition reopened on 1 August 1954. On 6 September 1955, a permanent exhibition venue for industry was established here. In 1958–1959, three separate projects devoted to agriculture, industry and construction were combined under the name VDNKh of the USSR.

In 1963, the Council of Ministers formalised the complex's organisation by sector and its year-round operation. Increasingly, the pavilions represented electrical engineering, chemistry, physics, metallurgy, standardisation and healthcare rather than individual republics. Government decisions made renaming a regular means of updating the exhibition's structure.

What the 1939 exhibition conveyed

The first All-Union Agricultural Exhibition opened on 1 August 1939 as a specialised agricultural exhibition of nationwide scope. It showcased record crop yields, new machinery and the administrative map of the state. The site featured sector-specific pavilions—such as ‘Mechanisation’, ‘Grain’ and ‘Horticulture’—alongside pavilions representing the union and autonomous republics, provinces and major regions. As visitors moved from one sector of the economy to another, they also discovered the country’s administrative geography.

Official materials from the VDNKh Museum attribute the master plan of the original ensemble to Vyacheslav Oltarzhevsky. The entrance, squares, pavilions, demonstration plots, fountains and sculptures guided visitors along a carefully structured route. Each building’s name served as an address on the map of achievements. ‘Belarusian SSR’, ‘Armenian SSR’ and ‘Far East’ denoted the representation of a particular territory, showcasing its products, natural resources and official image of its culture.

The 1939 All-Union Agricultural Exhibition (VSKhV) ran for 85 days and welcomed more than three million visitors. Some of the pavilions were intended for temporary exhibition use and were built extensively from wood, plaster and other materials that allowed the structures to be altered relatively quickly. Even the first version of the complex was designed to accommodate updates to its displays and architectural forms.

This approach explains why the search for a single ‘original appearance’ of VDNKh often leads to a dead end. For some structures, the 1939 building is considered the original; for others, it is the permanent version constructed in 1954, while some are best known to visitors in their remodelled form from the 1960s. An archival photograph of the opening rally on 1 August 1939 captures one moment in this history, but does not provide a universal model for the ensemble’s subsequent development.

How the 1954 reconstruction transformed the ensemble’s underlying logic

In the early 1950s, the designers effectively created a new ensemble based on the pre-war exhibition. The reconstruction was led by chief architect Anatoly Zhukov and sculptor Yevgeny Vuchetich; Zhukov developed the master plan together with Rolf Kliks. The grounds were expanded, the layout axes refined, and most of the original pavilions rebuilt or replaced with more permanent structures.

The main entrance was moved to the new triumphal arch designed by Innokenty Melchakov. The 1939 structure lost its ceremonial function and became known as the Northern Entrance. A new Main Pavilion, designed by Georgy Shchuko and Yevgeny Stolyarov, appeared on the central axis: its tiered composition and spire echoed both the Russian classical tradition and the silhouettes of Moscow’s high-rise buildings. In 1954, the ‘Friendship of Peoples’ and ‘Stone Flower’ fountains opened, along with the renovated ‘Golden Spike’ fountain.

The architecture of VDNKh in 1939 and 1954 differed primarily in its degree of monumentality. The post-war version was intended to appear enduring and ceremonial: colonnades, sculptural groups, mosaics, majolica, gilded details and national ornamentation came together to form an ensemble on a state scale. The façades still housed changing exhibitions, however, so the architectural shell and its contents could diverge within just a few years.

The architects linked post-war reconstruction with the economic achievements of the republics and the vision of a cohesive multinational state. National motifs were translated into the shared language of ceremonial Soviet architecture. The republican pavilions presented an official image of the republics’ cultures, devised for an all-Union stage, rather than literal examples of vernacular architecture.

Why the republican pavilions became symbols of 1954

The republican principle brought together geography, politics and decorative art. The façade immediately conveyed which part of the Union the building represented, while its materials and ornamentation created a distinctive identity. Inside, visitors were introduced to the republic’s agriculture, industry, culture and natural resources. The building’s name succinctly expressed the theme of this major state exhibition.

The Kazakh SSR Pavilion clearly illustrates how such an image was constructed. In 1954, the architects created a ceremonial showcase for the republic, incorporating national motifs and sculptural decoration. In 1964, the building was reassigned to the ‘Metallurgy’ exhibition: its dome was removed and its decorative elements concealed behind a new exterior. During the restoration of 2017–2020, specialists returned the architecture to its mid-1950s appearance. The history of this single building reveals three distinct interventions: the creation of an image of the republic, reassignment to an industrial theme, and the modern-day choice of a historical layer to restore.

A similar fate befell the Lithuanian SSR Pavilion, which opened in 1954 and was designed by K. K. Sheshelgis, A. Ya. Kumpis and Yu. A. Lukoshaitis. From 1964, it housed the ‘Chemistry’ exhibition. The Belarusian pavilion became ‘Electrical Engineering’, the Latvian pavilion ‘Physics’, the Moldavian pavilion ‘Standards’, the Armenian pavilion ‘Healthcare’, and the Ukrainian pavilion ‘Agriculture’. This new set of names transformed the map of the republics into a catalogue of industrial sectors.

After it was renamed, the building became part of a series of scientific and technological exhibitions. Its architectural identity, however, could remain unchanged. The new industrial theme thus existed alongside decoration originally designed to showcase the republic.

Why the shift towards industry began before the 1960s

The shift towards industry and space exploration grew out of several decisions taken before 1960. In 1955, the government established a permanent industrial exhibition; in 1958, it merged three exhibitions; and in 1959, it opened the VDNKh of the USSR. These steps steadily broadened the scope of the displays. Agriculture retained dedicated exhibitions, but no longer defined the entire structure of the complex.

The new programme called for different kinds of spaces. Large machines required wide spans and assembly areas, while scientific displays needed electricity, blackout facilities, screens and demonstration equipment. Visitors were shown finished products, models, newsreels, working equipment and manufacturing processes. The official photographic record of scientific and technological achievements at VDNKh in the 1960s encompasses nuclear power, radio electronics, computing, mechanical engineering and space exploration. Space became the most spectacular symbol of this transformation, although the programme was considerably broader.

A 1963 decree established the sector-based approach to industry and year-round operation. In the 1960s, the pavilions at VDNKh were transformed from regional showcases into showcases for different sectors of industry. The new names changed both the way visitors navigated the site and how they compared achievements: they moved between interconnected fields of knowledge and production. In this way, a technological map of the country took shape.

National decorative motifs, reliefs, coats of arms and spatial layouts survived under new names or concealed behind later cladding. The industry-themed exhibition was housed within the post-war ensemble, while individual pavilions of glass, metal and concrete appeared alongside colonnades and gilded sculpture. As a result, the industrial VDNKh never formed a cohesive modernist complex.

How to cross-check the dates of decisions, openings and new exhibitions

In the chronology of VDNKh, it is important to distinguish between the government decision, the opening of the exhibition, the renaming of the pavilion and the launch of the display. Reference texts often select a single milestone and condense the sequence. The dates 1958, 1959, 1963 and 1964 therefore refer to different events.

On 28 May 1958, the USSR Council of Ministers adopted a resolution to merge the industrial, agricultural and construction exhibitions into VDNKh of the USSR. The combined exhibition opened to visitors on 16 June 1959. The official anniversary album therefore regards 1958 as the year the organisation was founded, while historical and cultural assessments record its public opening in 1959. The first date refers to the establishment of the new organisation, and the second to the beginning of its operations.

The same distinction applies to 1963 and 1964. On 18 April 1963, the USSR Council of Ministers issued a resolution entitled ‘On the Reorganisation of the Work of the USSR VDNKh’. The sector-based structure was introduced gradually, and the new names became widespread across the exhibition grounds from the beginning of 1964. The phrase ‘the 1963 reform’ refers to the decision, while ‘the 1964 renamings’ describes its visible outcome.

The history of Pavilion No. 34 comes with an additional caveat. According to the official account, the building was given the name ‘Cosmos’ in 1967. Restoration materials use the full name ‘Cosmos/Mechanical Engineering’ and clarify that both exhibitions occupied the building and its surrounding grounds from 1967 to 1991. The name ‘Cosmos’ became established in common usage, while the full name more accurately reflects the scope of the displays.

The dual exhibition programme also explains the pavilion’s two numbers — No. 32 and No. 34 — which became established after the introduction of the space section. During the 1954 reconstruction, the architects added a domed hall to the pre-war hangar; in 1967, the exhibition designers installed the space exploration display in this new space while retaining the mechanical engineering exhibition. A complete attribution must take account of both phases of construction and both exhibitions.

When a New Name Required a New Façade

Sometimes a renaming involved little more than replacing the exhibition and its signage. In other cases, the existing façade was deemed incompatible with the new theme and was literally concealed behind a modern shell. A striking example is the ‘Volga Region’ pavilion, later known as ‘Radio Electronics and Communications’. Yevgeny Yakovlev and Iosif Shoshensky designed its 1954 incarnation as a narrative about the Volga, with sculpture, reliefs, fountains and porticoes completing the composition.

Reconstruction of the pavilion began as early as 1958, and in 1959 it was renamed ‘Radio Electronics and Communications’. Some of the decoration was removed and some concealed; the façades were clad in pressed aluminium panels, the roof was altered and a tall antenna mast was installed. The building was designed to resemble a giant radio receiver. The aluminium panels and antenna formed part of the exhibition concept: technology was presented through new materials and forms.

In the 21st century, restorers removed the later cladding and exposed the walls as they appeared in 1954. In doing so, they chose to present the pavilion in its republican style, although the modernist remodelling is also part of the building’s history. The present-day façade represents one of several documented layers. The pavilion’s full history also encompasses the decades when it resembled a device from the age of radio electronics.

After being repurposed to showcase computer technology, the former pavilion of the Azerbaijan SSR was also clad in metal panels. The building’s history reveals, how the names of VDNKh’s pavilions changed: along with new signage and exhibitions, architects sometimes transformed the entire appearance of a building.

How Mechanisation Became Cosmos

Pavilion No. 34 offers a particularly clear illustration of how a single structure successively served different visions of progress. The original Mechanisation building was designed by architects Ivan Taranov, Viktor Andreyev and Nadezhda Bykova for the exhibition’s opening in 1939. Its purpose reflected the exhibition’s agricultural focus: machinery was viewed primarily as a means of transforming agriculture.

For the 1954 opening, the original structure was reconstructed and augmented with a vast domed hall. Until 1956, it was known as ‘Mechanisation and Electrification of Agriculture in the USSR’; it was then called ‘Mechanical Engineering’ until 1966, before being renamed ‘Cosmos’ in 1967. This sequence reflects an expansion in scope: from machinery for the fields to machine production in general, and later to rockets, satellites and crewed spaceflight.

In 1967, a replica of the Vostok launch vehicle was installed in Industry Square, and the pavilion began to fill with space-related exhibits. Permanent exhibitions devoted to space exploration were held here from 1967 to 1991. Large spacecraft were displayed in the domed hall, which rises to almost 60 metres.

The original structure of the Cosmos Pavilion predates the space exhibition by many years. Its architecture combines a pre-war hangar, a post-war domed hall and alterations made in the 1960s. During a later restoration, specialists uncovered finishing materials dating from 1939 and 1954, including varieties of terrazite plaster containing mineral aggregate. Traces of the two phases of construction remain visible in the wall finishes.

What the Renamings Reveal about the Language of Power

The names used at VDNKh amounted to a public taxonomy of state priorities. In 1939, the exhibition explained how the country was organised through its territories and branches of agriculture. In 1954, it reinforced the image of the republics as participants in a unified post-war project. In the 1960s, scientific disciplines and production systems came to the fore. Each renaming conveyed to visitors which achievements were now considered exemplary and how they should be understood in relation to one another.

The notion of ‘Stalinist classicism versus Khrushchev-era modernism’ is too simplistic for this chronology. The shift to an industry-based organisation began with a decision taken in 1955, when the 1954 ensemble had only just opened. The sectoral principle was formally established later, while modernist façades and new buildings appeared gradually. The republican pavilions continued to operate within the thematic scheme: some retained their original architecture, while others were concealed behind applied structures.

The national decorative motifs of many buildings remained visible after they were renamed. The ‘Chemistry’ sign stood alongside the proportions and ornamentation originally created for the Lithuanian SSR Pavilion. This discrepancy arose because an ideological programme could be changed more quickly than a permanent architectural structure.

Documents record the decisions, dates and new names, while the surviving buildings allow us to examine their consequences. The state used the exhibition to organise its achievements into a compelling vision of the future. Each new version of this model altered the system of names, displays and façades.

How Architects Introduced Modernity

In the 1960s, architects used three different approaches: installing a new exhibition in an existing building, covering a historic façade with a modern structure, or constructing a separate pavilion. This is why VDNKh’s industrial layer appears so varied. Chemistry could be displayed behind the façade of a former republic pavilion, Radio Electronics and Communications acquired an aluminium shell, while new industries were given buildings designed from the outset in a different architectural language.

Following the 1963 decision, Soviet modernist pavilions appeared across the exhibition grounds. They included Pavilion No 21, Gas Industry, by Yevgeny Antsuta and Vladimir Kuznetsov; Pavilion No 29, Floriculture and Landscaping, by Igor Vinogradsky, Anatoly Rydayev and their co-authors; and Pavilion No 7, Seeds, by Zoya Arzamasova. Glass, slender supports, broad spans and free-form compositions reflected new possibilities in construction. These buildings formed a distinct architectural layer alongside the post-war colonnades and ornamentation of the republic pavilions.

Pavilion No 1 provides a contrasting example. Georgy Shchuko and Yevgeny Stolyarov built it in 1950–1954 to replace a wooden structure. It stands 97 metres high including its spire and covers 9,378.2 square metres; eight exhibition halls surround the main hall. Until 1963, it was known as the Main Pavilion and was then renamed the Central Pavilion. Its façade, however, was never given a modernist shell. The evidence supports a cautious conclusion: the new name indicated the building’s position within the layout of VDNKh, while the former name emphasised its pre-eminence within the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition.

The interiors of the Central Pavilion reveal another approach to renewal. The high relief ‘Glory to the Soviet People, Standard-Bearers of Peace!’, created by a team of sculptors led by Yevgeny Vuchetich for the 1954 opening, was later concealed behind sheets of plywood. The 90-square-metre composition, depicting more than 1,500 people, was discovered in 2014. Once covered with plywood, the high relief remained hidden until 2014. When examining the pavilion’s appearance, its concealed interiors should be considered alongside its façades and signs.

Three Eras in a Single Comparison

The three periods differed both in architectural style and in the basic unit around which their narratives were structured. In 1939, it was an agricultural sector or territory; in 1954, a republic presented with ceremony as part of a unified ensemble; and in the 1960s, a scientific and industrial sector.

Three Principles of Exhibition Organisation: Purpose, Names and Architectural Language

Period	Main Purpose	Naming Principle	Architectural Gesture
1939	Showcase the achievements of agriculture and the geography of the Soviet Union	Industries, republics, autonomous territories and regions	An exhibition city with demonstration plots and frequently updated pavilions
1954	Showcase post-war reconstruction and the unity of the republics	Pavilions representing the republics and industries	A monumental ensemble, a new ceremonial axis, fountains, sculpture and national ornamentation
The 1960s	Place science, industry and technological progress centre stage	Physics, chemistry, electrical engineering, metallurgy, mechanical engineering and space exploration	New buildings and modern shells of metal, glass and concrete covering some of the earlier façades

The table simplifies the actual chronology. Agricultural exhibitions continued to operate in the 1960s, industry had been represented earlier, and the republic-based principle existed before 1954. The overlap between these programmes explains why neighbouring buildings belong to different artistic systems, while a single pavilion may belong to several at once.

What physical evidence confirms the pavilions’ former functions

Inscriptions, fragments of decoration and concealed artworks make it possible to verify a pavilion’s history independently of its later name. An archival photograph shows its appearance on a particular day, while an on-site survey answers a different question: how much of the earlier architecture survives within the structure. Comparing these two types of evidence helps avoid the mistaken conclusion that a restored façade consists entirely of material dating from 1954.

The Southern Entrance arch once again bears the words ‘All-Union Agricultural Exhibition’, although this inscription was recreated by restorers. The abbreviation ‘VSKhV’ survives on the window grilles of the pumping stations along Central Alley. An intermediate phase is dated more precisely by the moulded inscription ‘VPE 1956’ in the foyer of Building No. 311, ‘Sericulture’. The All-Union Industrial Exhibition opened on 4 June 1956, occupied 12 pavilions and displayed more than 30,000 machines, instruments, models and scale models. A further nine buildings simultaneously showcased achievements in industry and agriculture. By 1956, the two programmes were already operating on the same site, while the inscription ‘VPE 1956’ recorded the shift towards industry before the name VDNKh appeared.

The history of Pavilion No. 31 shows how rapidly its themes changed. Built in 1954, it was initially called ‘Flax, Hemp and Other Bast-Fibre Crops’; in 1956–1957, ‘Bast-Fibre and Wool Industry’; in 1958, ‘Flax and Wool Industry’; and from 1959, ‘Geology’. The four names reflect four revisions of its purpose. Any conclusion about major reconstruction must be supported by separate checks of the drawings, building works and photographs from each period.

The restoration of the former Kazakh SSR pavilion demonstrates how specialists substantiate the reconstruction of lost features. They restored the ceramic façade decoration using fragments found beside the building, recreated four sculptures from archival photographs, and reproduced the pattern of the interior dome from colour newsreel footage. For each feature, the restorers used a different type of evidence.

Surviving element

A fragment of the structure or decoration from the relevant period that specialists uncovered, reinforced and retained in situ.

Recreated element

A lost feature remade using measurements, photographs, newsreel footage or a surviving specimen.

Exhibition layer

The design and equipment of a particular display; these could change without the pavilion itself being rebuilt and could disappear after the exhibition closed.

These distinctions change how the renewed ensemble is interpreted. A façade restored to its 1954 appearance may combine the original structure, newly uncovered decoration and remade details. Meanwhile, a metal shell added in the 1960s may have been dismantled. An architectural historian records both stages: the present result of restoration and the documented structure that formerly concealed the building.

How modern restoration shapes perceptions of VDNKh

The ensemble’s present appearance is the result of restoration decisions. In many projects, specialists chose the ceremonial appearance of 1954 as their point of reference. The Kazakhstan pavilion regained its national-republican architecture, while the façades of the former ‘Volga Region’ pavilion were uncovered after being concealed for many years beneath the metal shell of ‘Radioelectronics’.

The exposed 1950s decoration offers an opportunity to study the work of architects, sculptors and decorative-art craftsmen. Yet the shells that were removed belonged to the industrial era of VDNKh and reflected the official reappraisal of architectural language in the 1960s. Historical analysis also takes account of elements that were not preserved or that restorers decided not to recreate.

To attribute a pavilion correctly, one must establish the date of its original construction, its 1954 reconstruction, the sequence of its names, changes to its displays, alterations to its façades and the appearance selected for restoration. This checklist replaces arguments about the ‘authentic’ and ‘spoilt’ VDNKh with a verifiable biography of the building.

A single ensemble preserves traces of different exhibition programmes. Behind the restored national decoration lies the history of an industry-themed display; beneath the dome of ‘Cosmos’ is a structure designed for mechanisation; and the old entrance arch marks the 1939 layout. These elements reveal which layers were concealed by later decoration and uncovered again through restoration.

How to read VDNKh as a historical source

Attribution should begin by establishing separate dates for the structure, façade, signage and exhibition. ‘Cosmos’ predates its space-themed display by almost three decades, while many of the industry-themed names introduced in the 1960s were assigned to republican pavilions dating from 1954. A new exhibition could be installed in an old interior without major reconstruction; at times, a new façade concealed an earlier one while preserving its structure.

The architecture must then be compared with the sequence of government decisions. The years 1955, 1958, 1959 and 1963 mark different stages in the agricultural exhibition’s transformation into VDNKh. Losses and restoration choices also form part of this sequence: the dismantled metal shell of ‘Radioelectronics’ remains a documented layer of history, even though the decoration of the ‘Volga Region’ pavilion has once again been revealed in its place.

An individual pavilion should be considered in relation to the ensemble. The relocation of the Main Entrance, the new central axis and the fountains built in 1954 transformed the scale on which all the buildings were perceived. In the 1960s, industry-based wayfinding and exhibitions linked the pavilions into a system of scientific and industrial themes.

Conclusion: why VDNKh has several architectural layers

The pavilions changed names and appearance because the state repeatedly revised the programme of the working exhibition. In 1939, the buildings represented agricultural sectors and regions. For the 1954 opening, architects created a monumental post-war ensemble featuring pavilions for the Soviet republics. In the 1960s, the government refocused VDNKh on science, industry and space exploration, while designers concealed some of the earlier façades behind new outer shells.

These three snapshots allow the same structures to be read in different historical contexts. The Cosmos Pavilion combines a pre-war hangar, a domed hall dating from 1954 and a 1967 exhibition; the former republican pavilions retain traces of their reassignment to different industrial sectors; and the façades of the Volga Region Pavilion recall the now-removed outer shell of the Radio Electronics Pavilion. The modern appearance of VDNKh has evolved as a palimpsest of different eras. Signs help date changes in the exhibition programme, façades record architectural decisions, and restoration work determines which layer visitors see in the ensemble today.

You can compare these traces on site on the VDNKh tour ‘VDNKh and Space’: the route links the Main Entrance arch and the fountains of 1954, the former republican pavilions, Industry Square and the Cosmos Pavilion. The programme includes visits to the Azerbaijani and Belarusian national pavilions; interiors of other museums are not included.

Sources

1. About VDNKh
2. How the Country’s Main Exhibition Was Built: Celebrating Builders’ Day with VDNKh
3. From Agricultural Records to IT: How the VDNKh Pavilions Evolved
4. 55 Years Ago, Pavilion No. 34 at VDNKh Received Its Historic Name, ‘Cosmos’
5. Preserving Heritage: How the National Pavilions at VDNKh Are Being Restored
6. Cascading Fountains, Bas-Reliefs and Stained Glass: What the Volga Region Pavilion at VDNKh Will Look Like after Restoration
7. Vladimir Putin and Sergei Sobyanin Opened the Cosmonautics and Aviation Museum at VDNKh
8. Moscow Heritage. VDNKh: History and Restoration
9. State Historical and Cultural Expert Review Report on the Northern Entrance to VDNKh
10. View of the Central Square on the Opening Day of the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition
11. Achievements in Science and Technology at the USSR’s VDNKh: The 1960s
12. A Legendary Pavilion and Anniversary Arches: Exploring VDNKh’s Iconic Landmarks for Its 85th Anniversary
13. VDNKh Reveals the Most Popular Exhibits Among Visitors to the ‘#TretyakovGalleryAtVDNKh’ Exhibition
14. Marking the Centenary of the 1923 All-Union Agricultural and Handicraft Industry Exhibition
15. The New ‘Cosmos’: How the Pavilion Was Transformed During Its Restoration
16. The First Name, but Not Forgotten: The VDNKh Landmarks That Still Bear the Former Name of the Country’s Premier Exhibition
17. A City Within a City: VDNKh’s Director General Discusses the Future of the Legendary Exhibition
18. Public Report of the Moscow Department of Cultural Heritage for 2017